Skip to Main Content

Insight

July 10, 2025
Holland & Hart and SWCA Guide

Siting Energy and Transmission Line Projects in Arizona

While Arizona's patchwork of jurisdictions creates complexity, early engagement with regulators and careful project design can enable project proponents to navigate these challenges successfully, particularly given the state's historically pro-development stance.

Five key takeaways from this 2025 Arizona energy siting guide include:

1. New Rules Clarify CEC Triggers

  • A 2023 statutory amendment clarified that only transmission lines with 5+ structures spanning more than one mile at 115kV+ require a Certificate of Environmental Compatibility (CEC).

2. Renewable Mandates Under Attack Despite Market Momentum

  • Commission voted to repeal $3 billion renewable energy standards
  • Major utilities (APS, TEP, SRP) continue pursuing renewable goals independently
  • Market forces may continue driving renewable development, but REST rules may not

3. Federal Land Complicates Project Development

  • Less than 20% of Arizona is privately held—this increases the probability of NEPA triggers
  • Developers spend considerable time and money avoiding or addressing NEPA issues
  • Many project proponents prioritize private lands or State Trust lands to avoid federal triggers where possible

4. Tribal Sovereignty Creates Legal Complexity

  • Excellent resources but complex sovereign immunity and federal trust land issues

5. Navigating Arizona Water Law and Rights Is Tricky

  • Complex groundwater/surface water distinctions vary by geographic location
  • Colorado River shortages are impacting water needs for a range of projects
  • Municipal effluent, a “third category of water,” can be an option

Read Here


This publication is designed to provide general information on pertinent legal topics. The statements made are provided for educational purposes only. They do not constitute legal or financial advice nor do they necessarily reflect the views of Holland & Hart LLP or any of its attorneys other than the author(s). This publication is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship between you and Holland & Hart LLP. Substantive changes in the law subsequent to the date of this publication might affect the analysis or commentary. Similarly, the analysis may differ depending on the jurisdiction or circumstances. If you have specific questions as to the application of the law to your activities, you should seek the advice of your legal counsel.

DISCLAIMER

Unless you are a current client of Holland & Hart LLP, please do not send any confidential information by email. If you are not a current client and send an email to an individual at Holland & Hart LLP, you acknowledge that we have no obligation to maintain the confidentiality of any information you submit to us, unless we have already agreed to represent you or we later agree to do so. Thus, we may represent a party adverse to you, even if the information you submit to us could be used against you in a matter, and even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us.