• Thought Leadership
  • Holland & Hart News
  • Events


In a 6-to-2 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that when a public employer demotes an employee in order to prevent the employee from exercising his free-speech rights, the employee may challenge that action as a violation of the First Amendment and §1983, even if the employer was mistaken about the employee’s behavior.


April is an odd month in the Utah political scene. After the sprint-finish of the Legislative session and the whirlwind signing period for the Governor both concluded in March, many local political junkies can find themselves strangely depressed and looking for action. There is, of course, action to be found, you just have to know where to look!


On April 12, 2016, the majority of a three-judge panel at the Eighth Circuit U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals held that a class action of Best Buy shareholders, led by the IBEW Local 98 Pension Fund, should not have been certified, and the lower court misapplied the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Halliburton Co. v. Erica P. John, 134 S.Ct. 2398 (2014).


A federal court of appeals held that general insurance policies cover a data breach class action in a case that is highly likely to impact how courts throughout the country resolve insurance claims related to cyberattacks and policy renewal negotiations.


Unless you are a current client of Holland & Hart LLP, please do not send any confidential information by email. If you are not a current client and send an email to an individual at Holland & Hart LLP, you acknowledge that we have no obligation to maintain the confidentiality of any information you submit to us, unless we have already agreed to represent you or we later agree to do so. Thus, we may represent a party adverse to you, even if the information you submit to us could be used against you in a matter, and even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us.