Skip to Main Content

Insight

June 9, 2026
Immigration Law Update

Three Immigration Wins for Employers…and Why Caution Still Applies

Several recent noteworthy immigration developments emerged over the past week that may impact employers, visa applicants, and foreign nationals navigating the U.S. immigration system.

Key Takeaways:

  • Court blocks H-1B fee but caution around international travel still applies.
  • Expedited B visa interview appointments available July 1 at select posts for $750 — faster interview only, not faster outcome.
  • Travel-ban adjudication holds vacated — USCIS must resume standard processing.

1. Federal Court Blocks $100,000 H-1B Fee — But Travel Risks Remain

On June 8, 2026, a California federal district court ruled that the Administration's $100,000 fee on certain new H-1B visa petitions was unlawful, finding that the fee constituted an unauthorized tax that had not been approved by Congress. The decision blocks implementation of the fee nationwide, although further appeals are expected. While this ruling is welcome news for employers and H-1B beneficiaries, international travel continues to carry heightened risks. We continue to recommend caution before traveling abroad while an H-1B petition is being prepared, filed, or remains pending, given ongoing policy changes, increased visa scrutiny, and potential delays in visa issuance and reentry processing. (For background information on the $100,000 fee, H-1B Program Overhaul: New $100K Fee and Increased Enforcement)

2. Expedited B Visa Appointments Coming July 1 — For a $750 Fee

Beginning July 1, 2026, selected U.S. consular posts may begin offering B-1/B-2 visa applicants a temporary, optional expedited interview appointment for an additional $750 fee, subject to availability. The Department of State has not yet identified which posts will participate. The fee provides only faster access to an interview appointment—potentially within 10 business days—and does not guarantee visa issuance or expedite adjudication, administrative processing, or security clearances. Applicants should continue to plan travel and visa appointments well in advance, as delays may still occur even if an earlier interview is obtained.

3. Court Orders USCIS to Resume Processing Applications from Travel-Ban Countries

In a separate decision issued on June 5, 2026, a Rhode Island federal district court vacated USCIS policies that had placed immigration benefit applications on hold for individuals from countries subject to the current travel restrictions. The court also struck down related policies that directed adjudicators to treat an applicant's nationality from a travel-ban country as a negative discretionary factor. As a result, USCIS should resume adjudicating affected applications under standard procedures while litigation continues. (For background information on the immigration benefits hold, Ongoing Adjudication Delays from USCIS “Benefits Pause” and USCIS issued Policy Memorandum PM-602-0194, Hold and Review of USCIS Benefit Applications Filed by Aliens From Additional High-Risk Countries)

Looking Ahead

Although these developments provide some positive news for employers and foreign nationals, the immigration landscape remains highly fluid. As litigation continues and appeals are expected, employers and individuals should continue monitoring developments closely and consult immigration counsel before making travel or workforce planning decisions.


Subscribe to get our Insights delivered to your inbox.

This publication is designed to provide general information on pertinent legal topics. The statements made are provided for educational purposes only. They do not constitute legal or financial advice nor do they necessarily reflect the views of Holland & Hart LLP or any of its attorneys other than the author(s). This publication is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship between you and Holland & Hart LLP. Substantive changes in the law subsequent to the date of this publication might affect the analysis or commentary. Similarly, the analysis may differ depending on the jurisdiction or circumstances. If you have specific questions as to the application of the law to your activities, you should seek the advice of your legal counsel.

Holland & Hart Author

Ann Lee
Partner

Related Capabilities

Immigration Services
DISCLAIMER

Unless you are a current client of Holland & Hart LLP, please do not send any confidential information by email. If you are not a current client and send an email to an individual at Holland & Hart LLP, you acknowledge that we have no obligation to maintain the confidentiality of any information you submit to us, unless we have already agreed to represent you or we later agree to do so. Thus, we may represent a party adverse to you, even if the information you submit to us could be used against you in a matter, and even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us.