Skip to Main Content


Holland & Hart News Update

Recent California Legislation Clears the Path for Veterinary Cannabis

Last month our client alert covered the increasing popularity of cannabis products for pets in the face of regulatory uncertainty. This month we highlight recent California legislation that protects veterinarians who recommend cannabis therapies or supplements for animal use. California Assembly Bill 1885 amended the California Veterinary Medicine Practice Act and the California Medicinal and Adult-Use Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act to prohibit the California Veterinary Medical Board from disciplining a veterinarian who recommends cannabis as a therapy or health supplement for an animal, unless the veterinarian is employed by or has an agreement with a cannabis licensee.

In addition, the law requires regulatory action by the California Veterinary Medical Board and the California Department of Cannabis Control. The Board must adopt written guidelines for recommending cannabis by January 1, 2024 and post these guidelines to the Board’s website. The Department must promulgate regulations for cannabis products intended for animal use no later than July 1, 2025. Marketing and sale of cannabis products for animals is prohibited before the Department’s regulations take effect, and all cannabis products intended for animal use will be required to comply with the Department’s regulations. Assembly Bill 1885 passed with the support of the California Veterinary Medical Association and was signed by Governor Newsom on September 18, 2022.


Unless you are a current client of Holland & Hart LLP, please do not send any confidential information by email. If you are not a current client and send an email to an individual at Holland & Hart LLP, you acknowledge that we have no obligation to maintain the confidentiality of any information you submit to us, unless we have already agreed to represent you or we later agree to do so. Thus, we may represent a party adverse to you, even if the information you submit to us could be used against you in a matter, and even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us.