Skip to Main Content

Insight

February 20, 2026
Federal Affairs Update

Washington Update: February/March Congressional Work Period

The Congressional work period kicking off next week just got more exciting.

Today’s 6-3 Supreme Court ruling striking down President Trump’s dual sets of tariffs (those he said he imposed to repair trade deficits and those he said he imposed in response to the trafficking of fentanyl into the U.S.) puts a bigger spotlight on next Tuesday’s State of the Union address. Already occurring in a heated political climate and partial government shutdown, the political, economic, and trade world will be watching to see how President Trump intends to respond to the blow to his signature trade rebalancing initiative.

The Administration has other available mechanisms to impose new tariffs (Section 122 and Section 338), but none are as potentially long lasting or as easy compared to their previous approach.

  • Given the focus on affordability this year, imposing tariffs legislatively will be an incredibly difficult fight due to the razor thin margins in the House, and impossible in the Senate. This will add to the fight for a second, party-line reconciliation bill that allows for partisan passage, but it seems unlikely there are enough votes for tariffs through the legislative process, at least for now. (Both chambers voted against tariffs last year. While a presidential veto threat prevents those votes from stopping Trump's existing tariffs, that same voting dynamic would block any new tariff legislation. ) The Court’s ruling also leaves a hole in the budget, as $2 trillion in forecast income is now removed. Finally, the Supreme Court did not rule on rebates for the money already collected by the now-illegal tariffs, but claims are being made and this matter will have to settled as well. In his dissent, Justice Kavanagh identified the lack of process to address refunds as a serious concern: "One issue will be refunds. Refunds of billions of dollars would have significant consequences for the U.S. Treasury. The Court says nothing today about whether, and if so how, the Government should go about returning the billions of dollars that it has collected from importers."

Beyond tariffs, we will eagerly watch the State of the Union to see what action President Trump signals on other pressing 2026 issues, such as permitting reform, energy development, the upcoming highway bill reauthorization, and farm bill.

Speaking of the partial shutdown – all departments of the federal government have been funded for 2026 except the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Talks to resolve DHS funding appear to be at an impasse on the Hill.  The lack of urgency is in part because many DHS agencies are operating under reserves of money from the plus-ups they received under last summer’s “One Big Beautiful Bill,” and because many parts of DHS are essential and must continue operating during a shutdown. However, the frictions associated with missing paychecks and denial of new spending will start accumulating within FEMA, TSA, the Coast Guard, and other DHS sub-agencies, until this becomes a crisis that forces congressional action.

Also happening this work period is the beginning of the 2026 mid-term election cycle. Texas and North Carolina have their primaries March 3. Texas has the potential to be significant if four-time incumbent GOP Senator John Cornyn is upset by challenger Ken Paxton. Insiders believe a Paxton win would put Texas in play for a democratic pick up, threatening the GOP majority in the Senate. North Carolina is also regarded as a potential party switch. The Illinois primary on March 17, to pick the candidate to replace the second ranked Senate Democrat Dick Durbin, is considered a safe Democrat seat.

Additionally-

  • Despite the government funding bills for 2026 being so new, the 2027 funding season is full swing, with deadlines for congressional spending requests fast approaching.
  • Massive U.S. military deployments to the Middle East signal another possible strike on Iran, and soon. Congress will likely have to deal with forced votes (“Discharge Petitions”) on congressional approval of this as well.

More prosaically, next week the House will be considering bills to end Biden era energy efficiency and appliance policies. While not yet announced, sources indicate the Senate may consider their housing package.


Subscribe to get our Insights delivered to your inbox.

This publication is designed to provide general information on pertinent legal topics. The statements made are provided for educational purposes only. They do not constitute legal or financial advice nor do they necessarily reflect the views of Holland & Hart LLP or any of its attorneys other than the author(s). This publication is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship between you and Holland & Hart LLP. Substantive changes in the law subsequent to the date of this publication might affect the analysis or commentary. Similarly, the analysis may differ depending on the jurisdiction or circumstances. If you have specific questions as to the application of the law to your activities, you should seek the advice of your legal counsel.

DISCLAIMER

Unless you are a current client of Holland & Hart LLP, please do not send any confidential information by email. If you are not a current client and send an email to an individual at Holland & Hart LLP, you acknowledge that we have no obligation to maintain the confidentiality of any information you submit to us, unless we have already agreed to represent you or we later agree to do so. Thus, we may represent a party adverse to you, even if the information you submit to us could be used against you in a matter, and even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us.