Skip to Main Content

Insight

5/11/2006 12:00:00 AM

Voluntary Correction Gets A Spring Cleaning

Voluntary Correction Gets A Spring Cleaning

The Internal Revenue Service has released the long-awaited updated and expanded voluntary correction program (“VCP”) for employee retirement plans, the Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System (“EPCRS”), in new Revenue Procedure 2006-27.

Under EPCRS, plan sponsors can correct certain operational and document errors in employee retirement plans, in some cases without notice to the IRS. Correcting plans in this way allows employers to bring their plans into compliance without losing favorable tax treatment for retirement benefits.

The IRS has noted that plan sponsors who do not take advantage of EPCRS, and whose plans are found during examination to have qualification errors, will not receive the favorable tax (or penalty) treatment available in EPCRS programs.

The key changes to EPCRS include the following:

providing that if a plan sponsor corrects the failures in accordance with the requirements of the updated EPCRS, the plan will be treated as satisfying qualification requirements for purposes of the FICA and FUTA taxes;

• providing rules relating to the availability of programs under EPCRS in cases where the plan or plan sponsor is a party to an abusive tax avoidance transaction;

• updating the definition of “favorable letter;”

• updating the definition of “under examination;”

adding a correction method for certain plan loan failures;

revising the correction method for a failure to include an eligible employee in a 401(k) plan to lower the required percentage of compensation to be replaced by employer contributions;

• adding an alternative correction method for a failure to obtain spousal consent;

• providing that as part of both VCP and Audit CAP, if the failure involves the failure to satisfy the age 70½ minimum required distribution requirements of Code Section 401(a)(9), the IRS will waive the Code Section 4974 excise tax requirements in appropriate cases;

• clarifying submission procedures, providing a streamlined submission procedure for certain nonamender failures, and providing a submission assembly procedure;

• revising the requirements for submitting a determination letter application when correcting certain qualification failures by plan amendment;

• revising the acknowledgement procedures of receipt of a submission (and providing a new acknowledgement letter);

• reducing the compliance fee for a plan where the sole failure is the failure to timely adopt certain plan amendments;

• adding a fee schedule for plans in the determination letter process found to be nonamenders of tax law changes;

• providing that if a nonamender failure is discovered during an employee plans examination, then it is expected that the applicable sanction will be greater than the applicable fee;

• reducing the compliance fee for a plan where the sole failure is the failure to satisfy the minimum distribution rules for 50 or fewer employees;

• expanding the excise taxes that IRS may not pursue; and

• clarifying the scope of a compliance statement issued with respect to certain nonamender failures.

The update and expansion of EPCRS arrives at a time we are seeing increased enforcement efforts by the IRS, including the hiring and training of significant numbers of audit personnel. Thus, the IRS is taking a two-pronged approach to employee plan compliance: increased enforcement and the promotion of voluntary correction. The IRS has provided further information on voluntary compliance on their web page, "Correcting Plan Errors" which provides an EPCRS outline and tools for increased understanding of the voluntary correction programs.

For more information about how you might ensure your retirement plan’s compliance with qualification requirements, please contact Holland & Hart’s Benefits Law Group.


This publication is designed to provide general information on pertinent legal topics. The statements made are provided for educational purposes only. They do not constitute legal or financial advice nor do they necessarily reflect the views of Holland & Hart LLP or any of its attorneys other than the author(s). This publication is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship between you and Holland & Hart LLP. Substantive changes in the law subsequent to the date of this publication might affect the analysis or commentary. Similarly, the analysis may differ depending on the jurisdiction or circumstances. If you have specific questions as to the application of the law to your activities, you should seek the advice of your legal counsel.

DISCLAIMER

Unless you are a current client of Holland & Hart LLP, please do not send any confidential information by email. If you are not a current client and send an email to an individual at Holland & Hart LLP, you acknowledge that we have no obligation to maintain the confidentiality of any information you submit to us, unless we have already agreed to represent you or we later agree to do so. Thus, we may represent a party adverse to you, even if the information you submit to us could be used against you in a matter, and even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us.