Thomson Reuters Westlaw Journal Intellectual Property
Republished with permission, originally appeared in Thomson Reuters Westlaw Journal Intellectual Property on May 6, 2020.
In Romag Fasteners Inc. v. Fossil Inc., No. 18-1233, 2020 WL 1942012 (U.S. Apr. 23, 2020), the U.S. Supreme Court held that, in a trademark infringement suit, a finding of willful infringement is not a prerequisite to an award of the infringer’s profits, pursuant to Section 35(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1117(a). This article considers how to use nonjudicial settlement agreements in connection with trust administration, estate planning, and related disputes.
Andrea Anderson is a partner in Holland & Hart’s intellectual property group in Boulder, Colorado. She provides strategic counsel to large brands worldwide and assists clients with all aspects of brand creation and protection.
Please click here to read the full article: Supreme Court’s new profits awards standard unlikely to affect trademark litigation strategy.
This publication is designed to provide general information on pertinent legal topics. The statements made are provided for educational purposes only. They do not constitute legal or financial advice nor do they necessarily reflect the views of Holland & Hart LLP or any of its attorneys other than the author. This publication is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship between you and Holland & Hart LLP. Substantive changes in the law subsequent to the date of this publication might affect the analysis or commentary. Similarly, the analysis may differ depending on the jurisdiction or circumstances. If you have specific questions as to the application of the law to your activities, you should seek the advice of your legal counsel.