Skip to Main Content

Insight

4/23/2010

Recent Canadian Tax Changes Allow for Tax-Free Exit from Canada

By John Wilson, Co-Author

Recent Canadian Tax Changes Allow for Tax-Free Exit from Canada

The Canadian federal budget of March 4, 2010, amended the definition of taxable Canadian property to exclude shares of private Canadian companies, so long as those shares did not, at any time during the 60-month period prior to sale, derive their value principally from real or immovable property situated in Canada, Canadian resource property, or timber-resource property located in Canada. As a result, foreign owners of such shares may now dispose of them without waiting for a clearance certificate from the Canada Revenue Agency (“CRA”), without the purchaser withholding 25% of the purchase price, without reporting the sale to the CRA, and without paying any Canadian tax on the sale. These rules apply regardless of the home jurisdiction of the foreign vendor or the terms of any tax treaty between Canada and such jurisdiction.

U.S. corporations planning to set up Canadian subsidiaries, or having existing Canadian subsidiaries, that qualify for these new rules are now in a position to exit Canada on a sale of the subsidiaries’ shares without the burden of having to obtain a clearance certificate from the CRA. Moreover, they may be able to defer U.S. tax on the sale as well. For example, if the U.S. parent incorporates a Barbados International Business Company (“IBC”) as a wholly owned subsidiary, and the IBC in turn incorporates an Alberta Unlimited Liability Corporation (“ULC”) to operate the Canadian business, it should be possible for the IBC to sell the shares of the ULC down the road without Canadian tax and without current U.S. tax. If the IBC remits the sale proceeds to the U.S. parent, U.S. tax would apply, but no Barbados tax, since there is no withholding tax on dividends paid by IBCs. Alternatively, the IBC should be able to redeploy the sale proceeds into another active business venture anywhere in the world other than the U.S. without current U.S. tax.

For more information about the U.S. federal income tax aspects of this planning opportunity, please contact John Wilson or Peter Perla at Holland & Hart LLP in Denver, Colorado. For further information about this change in Canadian tax law or the Canadian aspects of this planning opportunity, please contact Ross Freeman at Borden Ladner Gervais LLP in Calgary.


Given the Canadian tax component of this alert, this article was co-authored by fellow tax counsel from the firm of Borden Ladner Gervais LLP. Ross Freeman is a partner in the Calgary office who practices exclusively in the tax area with emphasis on corporate, mergers and acquisitions, international and natural resources tax and also handles tax disputes with revenue authorities.


This publication is designed to provide general information on pertinent legal topics. The statements made are provided for educational purposes only. They do not constitute legal or financial advice nor do they necessarily reflect the views of Holland & Hart LLP or any of its attorneys other than the author(s). This publication is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship between you and Holland & Hart LLP. Substantive changes in the law subsequent to the date of this publication might affect the analysis or commentary. Similarly, the analysis may differ depending on the jurisdiction or circumstances. If you have specific questions as to the application of the law to your activities, you should seek the advice of your legal counsel.

DISCLAIMER

Unless you are a current client of Holland & Hart LLP, please do not send any confidential information by email. If you are not a current client and send an email to an individual at Holland & Hart LLP, you acknowledge that we have no obligation to maintain the confidentiality of any information you submit to us, unless we have already agreed to represent you or we later agree to do so. Thus, we may represent a party adverse to you, even if the information you submit to us could be used against you in a matter, and even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us.