Skip to Main Content

Insight

5/14/2014
Holland & Hart News Update

MSHA's Coal Dust Rule Lowers Acceptable Concentrations and Requires Continuous Monitoring

MSHA's Coal Dust Rule Lowers Acceptable Concentrations and Requires Continuous Monitoring

The Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) has finalized significant changes to the rule governing total permissible coal dust concentrations and the methods for sampling dust concentrations in underground and surface coal mines.

Effective August 1, 2014, MSHA inspectors will use single, full-shift samples to determine noncompliance with the respirable dust standards. The rule also requires immediate operator corrective action on a single, full-shift operator sample that meets or exceeds the Excessive Concentration Value (ECV) for the applicable dust standard, changes the averaging method to determine compliance on operator samples, expands requirements for medical surveillance of coal miners, and strengthens the certification requirements for certified persons who perform dust sampling and who maintain and calibrate sampling equipment.

Furthermore, on February 1, 2016, mine operators are required to use continuous personal dust monitors (CPDM) to monitor the exposures of underground coal miners in occupations exposed to the highest respirable coal mine dust concentrations and the exposures of part 90 miners. Use of the CPDM will be optional for surface coal mines, nonproduction areas of underground coal mines, and for underground anthracite mines using the full box, open breast, or slant breast mining methods.

Finally, starting August 1, 2016, the concentration limits for respirable coal mine dust will be lowered from 2.0 milligrams of dust per cubic meter of air (mg/m³) to 1.5 mg/m³ at underground and surface coal mines, and from 1.0 mg/m³ to 0.5 mg/m³ for intake air at underground mines and for part 90 miners (coal miners who have evidence of the development of pneumoconiosis).

As part of its justification, the new rule states that "[l]owering the concentration of respirable coal mine dust in the air that miners breathe is the most effective means of preventing diseases caused by excessive exposure to such dust."

The National Mining Association filed a petition with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit challenging the new rule and asking that MSHA postpone the implementation of the rule pending judicial review. The National Mining Association asserts that the required CPDM equipment will not be available until after the August 1, 2014 deadline and that there will not be enough time for mine operators to implement changes in sampling methods, among other things.

Text of the entire rule may be found here. We will keep you posted on any further developments related to this MSHA rule.

For More Information Contact:
Matthew M. Linton
Phone: 303.290.1095
Email: mmlinton@hollandhart.com


This publication is designed to provide general information on pertinent legal topics. The statements made are provided for educational purposes only. They do not constitute legal or financial advice nor do they necessarily reflect the views of Holland & Hart LLP or any of its attorneys other than the author(s). This publication is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship between you and Holland & Hart LLP. Substantive changes in the law subsequent to the date of this publication might affect the analysis or commentary. Similarly, the analysis may differ depending on the jurisdiction or circumstances. If you have specific questions as to the application of the law to your activities, you should seek the advice of your legal counsel.

DISCLAIMER

Unless you are a current client of Holland & Hart LLP, please do not send any confidential information by email. If you are not a current client and send an email to an individual at Holland & Hart LLP, you acknowledge that we have no obligation to maintain the confidentiality of any information you submit to us, unless we have already agreed to represent you or we later agree to do so. Thus, we may represent a party adverse to you, even if the information you submit to us could be used against you in a matter, and even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us.