Skip to Main Content

Insight

December 23, 2025
Immigration Law Update

DHS Issues Final Rule Implementing Weighted H-1B Cap Selection Process

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has issued a final rule, Weighted Selection Process for Registrants and Petitioners Seeking to File Cap-Subject H-1B Petitions, that significantly reshapes how H-1B cap-subject registrations are conducted from a random selection process to a weighted selection process that prioritizes higher-wage, higher-skilled H-1B beneficiaries while preserving access to the program across all wage levels. This rule is scheduled to take effect on February 27, 2026, in time for the FY 2027 H-1B registration season and represents one of the most consequential changes to the H-1B cap selection framework in recent years.

From Random Lottery to Weighted Selection

Under the current system, USCIS conducts a beneficiary-centric random selection where each unique beneficiary has an equal chance of selection, regardless of the wage level offered or the role’s seniority level. The final rule retains the beneficiary-centric model but layers in a wage-based weighting mechanism. Each registration for a unique beneficiary will be entered into the selection pool multiple times based on the highest Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) wage level for the relevant Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) code and area of intended employment, up to the point where the offered wage equals or exceeds that level. Beneficiaries would be entered into the selection pool as follows:

  • Wage Level IV: 4 times
  • Wage Level III: 3 times
  • Wage Level II: 2 times
  • Wage Level I: 1 time

Each beneficiary is still counted only once toward the numerical cap, but higher-wage roles will have a statistically greater likelihood of selection.

To support the weighted selection process and guard against manipulation, the final rule introduces several new compliance requirements:

Electronic Registration Stage

Registrants must now provide (in addition to the other requested data points):

  • The SOC code for the proffered position
  • The area of intended employment
  • The highest OEWS wage level offered that equals or exceeds

Petition Stage

Petitioners filing after selection must submit:

  • Evidence supporting the wage level indicated at registration
  • Confirmation that the SOC code, wage level, and job location are consistent with the Labor Condition Application (LCA)

USCIS is also granted enhanced authority to deny or revoke petitions where it determines that changes to wages, job duties, or locations were made to unfairly increase the odds of selection.

DHS Rationale and Policy Objectives

DHS emphasizes that the H-1B program was created to help US employers fill highly skilled positions and to enhance US competitiveness in the global economy. “The existing random selection process of H-1B registrations was exploited and abused by US employers who were primarily seeking to import foreign workers at lower wages than they would pay American workers,” said US Citizenship and Immigration Services spokesman Matthew Tragesser.

What Employers Should Do Now

With this rule finalized, employers should review wage structures for anticipated H-1B roles and should anticipate that many of their H-1B cap lottery candidates may ask follow-up questions about their wages. With the recently implemented Project Firewall, an H-1B enforcement initiative, employers should work closely with their legal team to ensure accurate SOC code and wage level determinations and properly align job descriptions with occupational codes and compensation strategies early on. The shift from a purely random lottery to a weighted selection framework marks a fundamental change in H-1B strategy. Early planning and careful compliance will be essential for employers seeking to remain competitive under the new system.


Subscribe to get our Insights delivered to your inbox.

This publication is designed to provide general information on pertinent legal topics. The statements made are provided for educational purposes only. They do not constitute legal or financial advice nor do they necessarily reflect the views of Holland & Hart LLP or any of its attorneys other than the author(s). This publication is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship between you and Holland & Hart LLP. Substantive changes in the law subsequent to the date of this publication might affect the analysis or commentary. Similarly, the analysis may differ depending on the jurisdiction or circumstances. If you have specific questions as to the application of the law to your activities, you should seek the advice of your legal counsel.

DISCLAIMER

Unless you are a current client of Holland & Hart LLP, please do not send any confidential information by email. If you are not a current client and send an email to an individual at Holland & Hart LLP, you acknowledge that we have no obligation to maintain the confidentiality of any information you submit to us, unless we have already agreed to represent you or we later agree to do so. Thus, we may represent a party adverse to you, even if the information you submit to us could be used against you in a matter, and even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us.