Skip to Main Content

Insight

7/23/2015
Holland & Hart News Update

So Long, Farewell: The Demise of the Determination Letter Program

Effective January 1, 2017, the staggered 5-year determination letter remedial amendment cycles for individually designed plans will end. This means that plan sponsors will no longer be able to request a determination regarding the qualified status of its individually designed plan every five years. Instead, individually designed plans will be able to receive a determination letter only on initial plan qualification and for qualification upon termination. We are currently filing determination letter applications for plans that fall in Cycle E (EIN ends in 5 or 0). Cycle A (EIN ends in 1 or 6), beginning February 1, 2016, will therefore be the final cycle under the current structure.

In addition, effective July 15, 2015, the IRS will no longer accept off cycle determination letter applications unless the request pertains to a new or terminating plan.

Many questions remain unanswered at this time. Should plan sponsors consider abandoning their individually designed plan? This may not be a viable solution for complex retirement plans. How does this affect the interim amendment rules? How will this affect the IRS’s voluntary correction program? Will IRS audits now include a comprehensive review of plan provisions for qualification requirements? How will this change affect the due diligence process in a merger & acquisition situation?

What we do know is that the IRS is considering ways to make it easier for plan sponsors to comply with the qualified plan document requirements and is requesting comments on certain issues relating to this announcement. We will continue to monitor this development and keep you posted on future guidance.

If you have questions on this or any other employee benefit matters, please contact any member of the Benefits Law Group.


This publication is designed to provide general information on pertinent legal topics. The statements made are provided for educational purposes only. They do not constitute legal or financial advice nor do they necessarily reflect the views of Holland & Hart LLP or any of its attorneys other than the author(s). This publication is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship between you and Holland & Hart LLP. Substantive changes in the law subsequent to the date of this publication might affect the analysis or commentary. Similarly, the analysis may differ depending on the jurisdiction or circumstances. If you have specific questions as to the application of the law to your activities, you should seek the advice of your legal counsel.

DISCLAIMER

Unless you are a current client of Holland & Hart LLP, please do not send any confidential information by email. If you are not a current client and send an email to an individual at Holland & Hart LLP, you acknowledge that we have no obligation to maintain the confidentiality of any information you submit to us, unless we have already agreed to represent you or we later agree to do so. Thus, we may represent a party adverse to you, even if the information you submit to us could be used against you in a matter, and even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us.