Skip to Main Content
9/10/2012

Holland & Hart Secures $24 Million Judgment for Blendtec®

Holland & Hart Secures $24 Million Judgment for Blendtec®

Holland & Hart LLP announced today that the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld a $24 million judgment issued in 2011 by the U.S. District Court of Utah in favor of K-Tec Inc., commonly known as Blendtec®.

In 2010, a jury found that Vita-Mix Corporation willfully infringed upon two patents relating to the unique design of Blendtec’s commercial blender jars, which alters the flow of liquid during blending to greatly increase blending efficiency. The jury awarded Blendtec approximately $11 million in royalty and lost profits damages, and the District Court added enhanced damages and prejudgment interest in 2011, for a final judgment of approximately $24 million – the largest patent judgment in Utah history.

Intellectual property attorney Brett Foster led the trial team consisting of Mark Miller and Tim Getzoff. In total, a team of more than 10 Holland & Hart attorneys, paralegals and staff supported the case over a four-year period.

“We could not be more thrilled with the result,” said Blendtec founder and CEO Tom Dickson. “Brett and the entire Holland & Hart team dedicated themselves to preserving one of Blendtec’s most treasured assets – our proprietary innovations.”

Vita-Mix Corporation had also sought to question the validity of the patents before the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office.  Holland & Hart’s team, led by Grant Foster, defended the patents before the Board of Patent Appeals and the Federal Circuit, both of which confirmed the validity of the patents.

DISCLAIMER

Unless you are a current client of Holland & Hart LLP, please do not send any confidential information by email. If you are not a current client and send an email to an individual at Holland & Hart LLP, you acknowledge that we have no obligation to maintain the confidentiality of any information you submit to us, unless we have already agreed to represent you or we later agree to do so. Thus, we may represent a party adverse to you, even if the information you submit to us could be used against you in a matter, and even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us.